"The universe is made of stories, not of atoms."
—Muriel Rukeyser
____________________________
Showing posts with label Stuart Connelly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stuart Connelly. Show all posts

Stuart Connelly's BEHIND THE DREAM


BEHIND THE DREAM
The Making of the Speech that Transformed a Nation

Author: Jones, Clarence B.
Author: Connelly, Stuart


A star is assigned to books of unusual merit, determined by the editors of Kirkus Reviews.


With the assistance of filmmaker and Huffington Post contributor Connelly, Jones, who was present at the creation of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, revisits the forces that generated the 1963 March on Washington and that animated the speech that now represents an entire era.

Essential reading about a moment of surpassing political and moral importance







On August 28, 1963, a photographer working for the United States Information Agency (USIA) took a picture which has become an iconic image of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. The photograph, in the holdings of the National Archives, is of a young African-American girl, holding a March on Washington banner and concentrating intently on the scene before her. The image has been reproduced countless times in history books, on calendars and most recently in the National Park Service brochure for the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in Washington, DC. Edith Lee-Payne of Detroit, Michigan, celebrated her 12th birthday by attending the March on Washington with her mother. She had no idea she had been photographed, let alone that over the years her face had become so well-known. Recently her sister saw the photograph in a calendar celebrating African-American history. She told Ms. Lee-Payne, who says she is still "in shock." Also appearing in the video is National Archives supervisory archivist Ed McCarter and the photographer to whom the image is attributed, Rowland Scherman. In addition to the famous image of Ms. Lee-Payne, many other USIA photos from that day are shown

Interview: Clarence B Jones on The Best Speeches of All Time



http://thebrowser.com



Speechwriter, counsel and friend to Martin Luther King Jr says that watching Dr King make the ‘I Have a Dream’ speech was like seeing lightning captured in a bottle

Roosevelt’s Inaugural Address is your first choice. Tell me about this speech.

This was made at a very critical period in our country’s history. It was a speech that every American who had a radio was listening to. I thought it gave the country a sense of hope, when all around them there seemed to be nothing but hopelessness. There were 25 million people out of work and the stock market had collapsed two or three years before, so this speech summoned the country to a sense of hope.

What is it about the actual speech, about the way it’s written, that is so brilliant?

Well, what impressed me about the speech was that, to me, the measure of or index of a good speech is not merely the words that are festooned together and spoken – presumably by someone who has a good delivery or even an exceptional delivery – but the extent to which the text of speech, the substance of the speech, is responsive and addresses the major issues of the time. I wasn’t so concerned about Roosevelt’s delivery, but I measured the text against the magnitude of the problem to which it was addressed.

The famous line is: ‘We have nothing to fear but fear itself.’

The country was in great fear. The country was in great despair, so that phrase was trying to speak to the Everyperson, to address the issue that was on everyone’s mind.

Tell me about JFK’s inaugural address.

Well, JFK, as you know, or maybe you don’t know, won the presidential election by merely 120,000 popular votes over Richard Nixon. The country was clearly divided; we were in the apex of what one would now describe as the Cold War, the great competition between ourselves and the Soviet Union, and here this younger man had taken over from Eisenhower, a World War II hero. This young man, whose inauguration day was relatively cold, some would say freezing cold, gave the address with no hat on, no scarf on, signalling the health and vitality of the new younger generation. He enumerated the problems that the country was confronted with, and then, of course, came the classic line: ‘Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.’ Just recently we had the passing of Sargent Shriver, who was the architect of the Peace Corps, the most celebrated form of government volunteer service that this country has ever had. The Peace Corps came out of the Kennedy administration. What came out of the address was that we could indeed be competitive with the Soviet Union, that this was a new generation coming into power and he wanted to say to the people that this new generation was ready – professionally ready, managerially ready, morally ready, militarily ready. It was up to the task.

Who wrote it?

Well, Theodore Sorensen contributed to it.

Did he write most of JFK’s speeches or help write them?

Yes, he helped write most of them.

Tell me about Laurence Olivier’s Oscar acceptance speech (which I’ll quote for our readers, since it’s not very long).

“Mr President and governors of the Academy, committee members,
fellows, my very noble and approved good masters, my colleagues, my
friends, my fellow students: In the great wealth, the great firmament
of your nation's generosities this particular choice may perhaps be
found by future generations as a trifle eccentric, but the mere fact
of it – the prodigal, pure, human kindness of it – must be seen as a
beautiful star in that firmament which shines upon me at this moment
dazzling me a little, but filling me with the warmth of the
extraordinary elation, the euphoria that happens to so many of us at
the first breath of the majestic glow of a new tomorrow. From the top
of this moment, in the solace, in the kindly emotion that is charging
my soul and my heart at this moment, I thank you for this great gift
which lends me such a very splendid part in this, your glorious
occasion. Thank you.”

It was a very short speech, and its power was in its spontaneity and its erudition. I don’t have to tell you that he was one of the great actors of the 20th century. A number of people who get Academy Awards come up and read from a written text or they say something that is kind of banal, but Olivier quoted some Shakespeare. It was very eloquent. It really spoke about the fact that he was honoured and humble – but it was just the way he spoke to this group of actors and actresses, and an example of the magnificent use of language.

What did he win for?

I think it was a Lifetime Achievement Award.

So, now we're moving on to your speech. The Martin Luther King.

Well, the Martin Luther King speech, of course… To understand it, you have to see it within the historical context. It was made three months after a very successful and very searing campaign in Birmingham, Alabama, in April of 1963, when the country and the world saw pictures of young negro girls and boys being pummelled against a wall with fire hoses and police dogs nipping at their ankles as they were peacefully marching in opposition to racial segregation. So that was April 63, and then, in August, some four months later, King was speaking at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial to more than 250,000 people. He was speaking to celebrate and to validate the success of the civil rights movement at that point, but also speaking prophetically about his hope for a better America. The ‘I Have A Dream’ speech, the portion that is most talked about, was totally spontaneous and extemporaneous. It wasn’t written.

You didn’t write that bit?

No. The contribution I made was in the first nine paragraphs. What happened was that as he got through reading the first nine paragraphs of prepared texts to which I contributed some language and concepts, he was interrupted by his favourite gospel singer, Mahalia Jackson, who was on the podium with him, and he paused in the middle of his speaking and she shouted: ‘Tell them about the dream, Martin! Tell them about the dream!’ At which point he put aside the written text. I was standing about 15 yards behind him, and I saw him, I read his body language and I said to the person standing next to me: ‘The people assembled here, they don’t know, it but they’re about ready to go to church.’ It appeared to me that he had gone into his preacher’s body mode.

What did that mean?

Well, before, he stood at the podium reading the text and looking up, but once he decided to speak extemporaneously he assumed a pose I had seen so many times when he was preaching a sermon from a pulpit, being a Baptist minister. He was no longer just a speaker at a public assembly, it was like he was speaking to a massive congregation in a church. And that’s when he went off into this extraordinary ‘I have a dream…’

What did you think? Did you think, ‘Oh no! What’s he doing to my speech?’

No! First of all, I didn’t consider it ‘my’ speech. I didn’t even know if he was going to incorporate and use the material in the first nine paragraphs. I didn’t know that until I heard it for the first time. I just thought it was rather bold and extraordinary for him to cast aside the written text, but Martin Luther King, Jr was a master orator. He didn’t need a written text to speak eloquently. Using contemporary parlance, I say to people that Martin Luther King, Jr was the only person I have ever observed or known – and I’ve never ever seen or heard anyone do it since – who could compose a speech extemporaneously in real time and while he was speaking. Like we use computer skills, he could cut and paste in his mind from previous speeches or writings and he could insert those excerpts into his real time speech. It was an extraordinary ability. It was a transcendental experience to be there. It was like watching lightning captured in a bottle.

I’m fascinated by what you say about him getting carried away and going into preacher mode, because I saw Bill Clinton speak at the London School of Economics, and he is a captivating speaker…

Yes, he is.

He got everyone in the room to fall in love with him, including an 80-year-old Republican oil magnate sitting next to me, but what he did was, he read slowly and falteringly for the first few paragraphs and then he put the speech aside and leant forward to go into preacher mode. He was probably trying to look like Martin Luther King.

That would be a very challenging task. I am frequently asked, since Dr King’s assassination on 4 April 1968: ‘Who today is most like Martin Luther King, Jr?’ I answer the question very quickly. I say: ‘Who today is most like Shakespeare, like Leonardo Da Vinci, like Michelangelo, like Beethoven, like Mozart? Who? No one.’

But they’re trying!

They try. Some people foolishly try, I believe.

I was just thinking about the wonderful oratorical techniques…

Well, Martin Luther King, Jr was a fourth-generation Baptist preacher, and I spent a good part of the 1960s not only around him but around a lot of other preachers. I would say during that period that there is a style, there is an inside way in which they talk about how they preach, and when you go and preach, they say, you have to be capable of telling them the story. You have to tell the story. The story is going to be whatever your text is going to be that day, but you have to tell it, in eloquent words, using various techniques, such as repetition. Some preachers will repeat a key phrase two or three times to make their point. Martin Luther King was the most gifted orator I had ever heard and that I can ever remember hearing in my lifetime. No one, no person I have ever heard, any place, any time, anywhere on this earth can speak as eloquently as Martin Luther King, Jr.

You sound as if you did know, while you were standing there, what kind of impact the speech was having. Do you think everybody did? Did it seem as momentous then as it does now, or did it seem more momentous then than it does now?

Well, when Dr King was introduced, he was the last speaker of the formal programme, and everyone had been waiting. So when A Philip Randolph said, in this deep sonorous voice, ‘And now, ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters, the man and the voice that we have been waiting for, the unquestioned moral leader of this nation – I am pleased to introduce the Reverend Dr Martin Luther King, Jr,’ the place exploded. The place was electrified; it was like he had dropped a match and more than 250,000 people exploded in public adulation and acclaim for the person who was about to address them. And then, while he was speaking, particularly when he began to speak extemporaneously in his Baptist preacher mode, it was transcendental. I had heard and seen Martin Luther King give many speeches, under many different circumstances, but this speech was extraordinary.

Tell me, lastly, about the Nelson Mandela. It’s not going to compare at all – I’m feeling sorry for Nelson now!

Well, you should not. Remember what I said earlier? In my judgment, the measure of a speech is not merely the text or words, or even the person who delivers the speech, but the context of the speech. And here the power of Nelson Mandela’s speech is not merely the words he has put together, but the power of the context. Here is a man who was in prison for 27 years, and now he is addressing the country on his inauguration as its president after a period of painful governance, a period of rigid, brutal apartheid. This former political prisoner is now president of the country, and he gives a speech in an effort to guide the country through a peaceful transition to a multiracial society. I mean, what a circumstance! The power, even the pomp and circumstance of the parliament and legislature, and you have President Nelson Mandela of South Africa addressing his country for the first time as president of the republic of South Africa. It’s the context! It’s the power of the moment!

Is it a good speech, though, in itself?

Yes. It’s a good speech. It’s a speech that is responsive and relevant to the particular historical moment in time. If you know anything about South Africa… When did he give the speech?

1994.

If you know anything about the preceding 25 years, that has to be an amazing speech. If I just say to you: ‘The former prisoner of Robin Island who was incarcerated for 27 years is now speaking as President of South Africa,’ that says it all.

It does. If you’re only allowed one of these speeches, I assume you’re taking Dr King’s?

If I’m only allowed one of the speeches…

Or you’re only allowed one line from one of the speeches.

Oh, then no question, Martin Luther King. There are two lines. First of all the beginning – and this is a paraphrase, it’s not exact: ‘We’ve come here to the foot of this great monument to redeem a promissory note that has been returned unpaid for insufficient funds.’ The promissory note is the guarantee of negroes’ freedom under the Declaration of Independence, and he says: ‘I refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the vaults of justice.’ That’s language that I crafted. And the other part I think is so moving if you know something about the history of the United States of America. ‘I have a dream that one day the great-great-grandsons of slaves and the great-great-grandsons and granddaughters of slave owners will sit down at the table of brotherhood. I have a dream, one day…’ Think about it. He dreams that the country will become one America, that it will become so reconciled that the descendents of former slave masters and former slaves will sit down at the table of brotherhood in our country. If you look at the speech or listen to it carefully, it’s all in the future tense. ‘One day I will…’ It’s always prophetic, always in the future. He reflected a more prophetic confidence in America than America had in itself.



Interview by
Anna Blundy

So to Speak | Joe Blundo commentary: Speech transcended notes as King recalled 'dream'

http://www.dispatch.com


Clarence B. Jones helped write the part of the "I Have a Dream" speech that is rarely quoted.

And that's fine with him.

When the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. went off script midway through his address on Aug. 28, 1963, he uttered some of the most famous words in American history.

In doing so, King borrowed a theme from a previous speech, expanded on it and delivered it in a way that riveted his enormous audience.

Jones, 80, compares the improvised performance to that of a jazz virtuoso.

"It was like watching lightning in a bottle," he said in a phone interview.

Jones, a lawyer and confidant of King's in the 1960s, is a co-author of the book Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech That Transformed a Nation.

He will discuss it during a McCoy Lecture Series address on April 20 in New Albany.

Jones' book offers an inside view of the events leading up to King's speech at the 1963 March on Washington, which drew 250,000 people.

As just as their cause was, civil-rights leaders were not without ego in pursuing it.

Jones, a scholar in residence at Stanford University in California, recounts the jockeying over who would get to speak last at the march.

He eventually asked two questions, he said, that quelled the arguing. Referring to King, he said: "Have most of you heard him speak? Do you really want to follow him?"

The night before the speech, King, Jones and other organizers sat in a Washington hotel lobby to discuss what King should say. Jones took notes and, at King's request, retired to his room to write a draft incorporating the ideas.

He returned with a draft that compared the Declaration of Independence to a promissory note on which the nation had failed to deliver because it wasn't treating all citizens as equals. King took Jones' notes to his room.

When King began his speech the next day, he started with Jones' words.

"I was astounded when I heard him speak them," Jones said.

Then, a few minutes into the address, gospel singer Mahalia Jackson shouted out, "Tell them about the dream, Martin."

She was referring to a speech that King gave a few months earlier in Detroit. Jones watched as King pushed his prepared remarks aside and seemed to gather himself.

Jones turned to someone beside him and said, "These people don't know it, but they're about to go to church."

The combination of the crowd's energy and King's unique ability to find - on the spur of the moment - the right combination of words added up to what is remembered today, Jones said.

"It was the most magical, extraordinary thing to see."

Joe Blundo is a Dispatch columnist.

jblundo@dispatch.com

Dr. Marshall of Street Soldiers Radio interviews Mr. Clarence Jones, Author of Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech








Dr. Joseph E. Marshall, Jr. is an author, lecturer, radio talk show host, and community activist. He is the founder of the Alive & Free Movement and the founder and president of the Street Soldiers National Consortium, an organization dedicated to fighting violence nationwide. He is also the co-founder and Executive Director of the Omega Boys Club/Street Soldiers, a youth development and violence prevention organization headquartered in San Francisco, CA that emphasizes academic achievement and non-involvement with drugs. This organization, founded in February of 1987, has produced 151 college graduates, all supported by the Omega Boys Club Scholarship Fund. Another 50 Omegas are currently enrolled in college.


Listne to Clarence and Dr. Joseph Marshall on his radio show Street Soldiers.

Forbes Reviews AEI Clients Clarence B. Jones and Stuart Connelly's Behind the Dream!





Nick Morgan

Nick Morgan



Persuasive Public Speaking


Go Behind The Dream: How Martin Luther King’s Great Speech Happened

One of the most remarkable books in recent years for students of public speaking is Clarence Jones’ Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech That Transformed a Nation. The book puts us in the moment when King raised his hand high in the air, stood on tiptoe, and said, “Free at last, free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!” The crowd erupted in a roar that has reverberated down the years and generations to the election of Barack Obama as the 44th president, but also to countless individual dreams realized in the slow march to racial equality.

Jones was Martin Luther King’s lawyer, and one of his inner circle of advisors. That put Jones in a very good position to witness the development of the idea for the march on Washington, the planning for it, and the event itself. He recaptures very convincingly the state of mind of King’s circle beforehand, not knowing whether or not the speech would be a success, worrying about harassment from the FBI, and struggling with the demands of all the groups that wanted to be involved and have their say in how the day worked.

In the end, of course, it worked very, very well. Jones moves on to talk about the development of the speech – he was also King’s speechwriter – and takes credit, essentially, for the first half of the speech. This section talks (in somewhat legalistic terms) about the promissory note still due American blacks because of the injustice meted out to them over the previous several hundred years.

Of course the magic happened in the second half of the speech, where King left his script and ad-libbed the incredible “I have a dream” sequence, as I’ve blogged about before. What Jones adds is that the impetus to ad-lib came from Mahalia Jackson, the great singer, who had treated the audience to a heartfelt rendition of a gospel number, “I’ve been ‘buked and I’ve been scorned,” just before King began to speak. She shouted to King, according to Jones, “Tell ‘em about the dream, Martin, tell ‘em about the dream!” about midway through the speech.

Jones’ theory is that King heard those words, and in nanoseconds decided to throw away his script and begin ad-libbing.

It makes a great story, and of course it’s possible. But my hunch is that King must have realized that he wasn’t connecting with the audience several minutes before that. A decision like that comes from a growing sense that you need to shift gears because of the unconscious messages the audience sends you. Jackson’s urging might well have tipped the balance, but unless it was reinforced with King’s own feeling about the audience, I doubt one shouted comment alone would have had the effect Jones attributes to it. King’s speaking style, from his Baptist minister days, incorporated a good deal of ‘call and response’, so there was lots of shouting going on.

If you watch the filmed record of the event, all you see is the shift itself, with King mostly reading the script in the first half of the speech, to him directly addressing the crowd in the second half. Make a decision to go off script he clearly did, but what prompted the decision? We will never know for sure.

Nonetheless, Jones was there and I wasn’t, and his tale adds to the lore of what is one of the greatest speeches of the 20th century. The book is wonderful, and rewarding for students of public speaking as well as of the civil rights era. History is all too often written backward, with the certainty of future knowledge lending inevitability to the author’s insights. Jones is particularly skilled at giving us the contingent nature of events as the happen, and that is a great gift to anyone who wants to understand where we’ve really come from. Highly recommended.

For more detailed analysis of King’s speech, especially of the ad lib section, see my earlier blog, “What you don’t know about King’s ‘I Have a Dream’ speech.”


Forbes

March 1st Book Party and Reception for AEI Client Stuart Connelly's Behind the Dream




Please Join Us for a Book Party and Reception

Honoring Clarence B. Jones and Stuart Connelly’s Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech that Transformed a Nation

On August 27, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. gathered his trusted advisors in the lobby of the Willard Hotel to brainstorm ideas for his speech for the March on Washington. His lawyer and close friend, Clarence B. Jones, joined the group – sheltered behind a curtain of plants, chairs and watchful porters – and took notes on the discussion. Later, Clarence went up to his room to produce a draft, not realizing the speech he was working on would forever change the nation.

A few hours later, the arc of history bent, as King invoked the immortal words “I have a dream…”

Now, Clarence Jones and Stuart Connelly have written an extraordinary account of the March on Washington and the Dream Speech, Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech that Transformed a Nation. Please join Third Way to honor and celebrate their work when Mr. Jones returns to the Willard on Tuesday, March 1st at 6:00pm.

CLICK HERE to RSVP, or reply to this email.


Event:
Book Party: Honoring Clarence B. Jones and Stuart Connelly’s Behind the Dream: The Making of a Speech that Transformed a Nation
Date:
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Time:
6:00pm to 8:00pm
Location:
The Willard Hotel
Holmes & Hughes Rooms
1401 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20004

CLICK HERE to RSVP or reply to this email. If you have any questions about this event, please contact Kristen Kiewiet de Jonge at KristenK@thirdway.org or call 202-384-1726.

ABOUT US: Third Way is an innovative and influential think-tank that creates and advances moderate policy and political ideas. We advocate for private-sector economic growth, a tough and smart security strategy, a clean energy revolution, bold education and anti-poverty reforms, and progress on divisive culture issues.

This event has been organized to meet the requirements for a widely attended event as set forth in the Congressional ethics rules.


©2011 Third Way
Message sent by Third Way. Unsubscribe

King's iconic `Dream' speech was ad libbed, former adviser reveals

‘Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech That Transformed a Nation’

By Clarence B. Jones and Stuart Connelly

Published by Palgrave Macmillan, 204 pages, $22

By Steve Weinberg • Special to the Post-Dispatch

http://www.stltoday.com

As a Southern Baptist preacher, Martin Luther King Jr. developed a talent for presenting sermons that came from the heart as well as the intellect. His ability to speak extemporaneously served King well many times, but none better than on Aug. 28, 1963. On that day, the controversial, charismatic civil rights leader spoke to about 250,000 people at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington.

King's speech has since become known as the "I Have a Dream" speech. In "Behind the Dream," one of King's closest advisers reveals that the phrase "I have a dream" never appeared in the prepared text, and neither did some of the sentiments ad libbed by King to the multiracial throng mashed together in the nation's capital.

The ad libbing began after King had presented a more-or-less set speech (reprinted starting on page 105 of the book). At a point when King paused, gospel singer Mahalia Jackson, sitting near him, said to him, "Tell 'em about the Dream, Martin…" Amid the din of the crowd, not many heard Jackson's suggestion. But Clarence B. Jones did, and so did King.

Jones could see King turn over the prepared text and "begin riffing on a theme that he had used on more than one occasion, without previously generating much of an enthusiastic reaction."

This time, though, King's instinct told him enthusiasm would reign. The new direction of the speech sounded practiced just for that occasion, although it was not. King's "dexterity with memory and words ran along the lines of the cut-and-paste function in today's computer programs," Jones reveals.

Jones understood that King had delivered a pitch-perfect sermon to the masses: "The effect was nothing short of soul-stirring."

How Jones became a King adviser is an interesting part of the book. Jones, an African-American, had paid little attention to the civil rights movement, organized religion or King until 1960. Before that, the young lawyer was focused on making money, providing material possessions and comfort for his family. When the government appeared to be saddling King with a questionable tax-evasion charge, one of the minister's high-level counselors asked Jones for legal assistance. Jones said no, thinking to himself — uncharitably and unlawyerly: "Just because some Negro preacher got his hand caught in the cookie jar, that is not my problem."

King did not express dismay openly, but Jones' wife, Anne, did express dismay. So he reluctantly accepted King's invitation to attend a guest sermon at a Los Angeles church, which was near Jones' home at the time. Attending the powerful sermon altered Jones' life course. He became a King disciple.

Stuart Connelly is a professional writer and filmmaker who helped Jones write the book, but the sentiments are those of Jones, a lesser-known yet knowledgeable King aide. Jones' role in conceiving and drafting what morphed into the "dream" speech gave him satisfaction then and now.

Jones understands that the achievement of unadulterated civil rights remains a goal, not a reality. A post-racial United States is not even close to being achieved, he says, despite the election of President Barack Obama:

"Racism continues to fester in every city, town and village of this country."

Steve Weinberg of Columbia, Mo., reviews books regularly for the Post-Dispatch.

Copyright 2011 www.STLtoday.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

AEI Client Stuart Connelly and Clarence Jones' Behind The Dream Reviewed




Has Martin Luther King's dream come true?

When I helped draft that 1963 speech, none of us imagined an African American president. But US society is far from post-racial.

By Clarence Jones

Clarence B Jones

    The 1963 civil rights march on Washington where Martin Luther King Jr delivered his 'I have a dream' speech: Video: YouTube



    In 1963, I had a contentious meeting with Robert Kennedy. In defending the civil rights achievements of his brother John and the Justice Department during his tenure as attorney general, RFK predicted that, "in 40 years", a negro might be president of the United States. Those of us who worked closely with Martin Luther King Jr never contemplated the possibility of a black president in our lifetimes. Kennedy turned out to be off by only five years.

    In 2008, I travelled to France as the guest of SOS Racisme and the mayor of Paris. My invitation was part of the city's celebration of the 60th anniversary of the UN's Declaration of Human Rights and commemoration of the legacy of Dr King, 40 years after his death. One question asked of me, again and again there, was: Does the election of Obama as president of the United States mean that Dr King's dream has been fulfilled?

    This is posed as a yes-or-no question, and I find that troubling. Because the situation is one of degrees. The problems of prejudice exist on a continuum. A better question might be: have we even come close?

    Much progress has indeed been made. As a participant in the civil rights movement, I'm proud of that progress. But as long as there is necessity for such a legal category as hate crime, the "Dream" remains unfulfilled. As long as DWB ("Driving While Black") in the presence of police remains a perilous activity for many African Americans throughout our nation, the Dream remains diluted. As long as unemployment among African Americans keeps repeating the historic ratio of double the rate of unemployment among white people, the Dream remains unfulfilled. As long as polarisation of wealth and absence of equal access to economic opportunity continue to escalate and disproportionately affect African Americans, the Dream remains unfulfilled.

    These are not anomalies; they are realities in America. As such, the Dream that Martin Luther King Jr brought to us remains out of reach.

    Those who argue that our election of an African American president proves that racism is a thing of the past are not looking closely at the subtleties of racism. Of course, Barack Obama is living proof that progress has been made towards respect for African Americans, but consider the hatred that bubbled up as he gained momentum in the primaries.

    Even Obama's eventual running mate, Joe Biden, was scrutinised by the media over a possibly racist comment. Among the adjectives he used to describe his then opponent, Biden offered "African American" and then the word "clean". And while he kept backpedalling, saying he meant the phrase to invoke the idea there were no skeletons in Obama's closet, one cannot help but wonder. Would Biden or any other public servant ever describe someone like John Kerry as "white and clean?" It is doubtful.

    The post-racial America it's been suggested we achieved by Obama's election is nowhere in sight. The truth may be that we don't want to admit to ourselves that an African American president does not mean a society wholly accepting of all African Americans. Indeed, racism continues to fester in every American city and town. We can safely, if sadly, say that we have not fully achieved the Dream.

    Those who say otherwise simply have not taken the requisite look at the underlying political ideology that powered the philosophical engine of Martin Luther King Jr. The essence of his dream for African Americans after the March on Washington was this: a United States where every person has the equal opportunity – educationally, economically, culturally and politically – to participate in our society and develop themselves to the maximum of their abilities, irrespective of the colour of their skin or ethnicity. This concept assumes that, all other things being equal, African Americans should have access to the same opportunities as whites.

    But this "all other things being equal" is the lie of race relations in America. Because our country has not levelled the playing field at all. Various civil rights bills, constitutional amendments and supreme court decisions aimed at dismantling segregation in education, transportation and rental housing, have not constituted "all other things being equal". Ours is a capitalist society, and each individual's market power is key to how he is treated. There remains an enormous division between the races when it comes to median income, home ownership, education, life expectancy, the incarceration rate, drug use and mortality rate.

    The issue at the heart of all these problems is the idea that freedom and economic opportunity are interchangeable; that freedom is economic opportunity. This is false logic. Freedom without economic opportunity is just a variant form of oppression. Further, this thinking is dangerous because it obscures the definitive criterion necessary in evaluating the realisation of Martin's Dream for African Americans in the 21st century and beyond: wealth.

    • This article is adapted from Clarence B Jones' new book, co-authored with Stuart Connelly, Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech That Transformed a Nation, published by Palgrave Macmillan


    http://www.guardian.co.uk


On Martin Luther King Day, remembering the first draft of 'I Have a Dream'

washingtonpost.com

On Martin Luther King Day, remembering the first draft of 'I Have a Dream'

Adapted from "Behind the Dream" by Clarence B. Jones and Stuart Connelly. Copyright 2011 by the authors and reprinted by permission of Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited.


It was the late spring of 1963, and my friend Martin was exhausted. The campaign to integrate the public facilities in Birmingham had been successful but also tremendously taxing. In its aftermath, he wanted nothing more than to take Coretta and the children away for a vacation and forget - forget the looming book deadline, the office politics of his ever-growing Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the constant need to raise funds.

But a date for the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom had been nailed down - Aug. 28 - and Martin realized he couldn't plan such a massive undertaking with the usual endless interruptions. No, if this march were going to come together in time, he would have to escape all the distractions. (This was a man, after all, whose best writing was done inside a jail cell.) He needed to get away to a place where very few people could reach him.

That would be my house in Riverdale, N.Y.

For the previous three years, I had been an adviser to Martin Luther King Jr., his personal lawyer and one of his speechwriters. Stanley Levison, another adviser who had done even more work with Martin on his speeches than I had, was also a New Yorker. Because of some dark ops on the part of the FBI, Martin could not deal directly with Stanley, yet he very much valued his advice, so it made sense for Martin to stay at my home and have me act as a go-between as we planned the March on Washington - and the speech Martin would deliver.

The logistical preparations for the march were so burdensome that the speech was not a priority for us. Early in the summer, Martin asked some trusted colleagues at the SCLC for their thoughts on his address, and during his weeks in New York, we had discussions about it. But it wasn't until mid-August that Martin had Stanley and I work up a draft. And though I had that material with me when I arrived at the Willard Hotel in Washington for a meeting on the evening of Tuesday, Aug. 27, Martin still didn't know what he was going to say.

We met in the lobby rather than in a suite, under the assumption that the lobby would be harder to wiretap. Tables, chairs and plants acted as a cordon of privacy. It was with this odd start, hiding in plain sight, that 12 hours before the March on Washington began, Martin gathered with a small group of advisers to hammer out the themes of his speech.

He had reacted well to the material Stanley and I had prepared, but he also knew that many of the march's supporters and organizers - labor unions, religious groups, community organizations and academic leaders - needed to be heard as well. So that evening he had a cross-section of advisers present to fill any blind spots. Cleveland Robinson, Walter Fauntroy, Bernard Lee, Ralph Abernathy, Lawrence Reddick and I joined him, along with Wyatt Walker and Bayard Rustin, who were in and out of our deliberations.

As we ate sandwiches, our suggestions tumbled out. Everyone, it seemed, had a different take. Cleve, Lawrence and I saw the speech as an opportunity to stake an ideological and political marker in the debate over civil rights and segregation. Others were more inclined for Martin to deliver a sort of church sermon, steeped in parables and Bible quotes. Some, however, worried that biblical language would obfuscate the real message - reform of the legal system. And still others wanted Martin to direct his remarks to the students, black and white, who would be marching that day.

Martin got frustrated trying to keep everything straight, so he asked me to take notes. I quickly realized that putting together these various concepts into a single address would be difficult. Martin would have to take one approach - his own - with the other ideas somehow supporting his larger vision. I kept on taking notes, wondering how someone would turn all this into a cohesive speech. As it turned out, that would be my task.

Eventually, Martin looked to me and said, "Clarence, why don't you excuse yourself and go upstairs. You can summarize the points made here and return with an outline."

I sat in my room, flipping through the scrawled pages of the yellow legal pad, struggling to boil down everyone's perspectives. The idea of urging the crowd to take specific actions, as opposed to a general kind of complaining, seemed one area of agreement. (The march's organizing manual even had a headline that spelled it out: "What We Demand.")

A conversation that I'd had during the Birmingham campaign with then-New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller inspired an opening analogy: African Americans marching to Washington to redeem a promissory note or a check for justice. From there, a proposed draft took shape.

And the words "I have a dream" were nowhere in it.

About an hour later, I took my writing back to the lobby and began presenting it to the group. Immediately the others interrupted:

"What about - "

"Why didn't you - "

"I thought we agreed - "

They were all over me. And given the fact that several were Baptist preachers, there was no small amount of grandstanding. I began defending myself, but Martin intervened. "Okay, brothers," he said, "thank you so much everybody for your suggestions and input. . . . I am now going upstairs to my room to counsel with my Lord."

He walked quietly toward the elevators, leaving the rest of us to look at each other. "Tomorrow, then," someone said, and we dispersed.

***

Tomorrow, as history would record, turned out to be an enormous success. The weather and the massive crowd were in sync - both calm and warm for the March on Washington. Even the D.C. Metropolitan Police, which had been bracing for a race riot, had nothing to complain about.

I remember when it was all over but the final act. As I stood some 50 feet behind the lectern, march Chairman A. Philip Randolph introduced Martin, to wild applause, as "the moral leader of our nation." And I still didn't know how Martin had pulled the speech together after our meeting.

After Martin greeted the people assembled, he began his speech, and I was shocked when these words quickly rolled out:

It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note, insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check.

Martin was essentially reciting the opening suggestions I'd handed in the night before. This was strange, given the way he usually worked over the material Stanley and I provided. When he finished the promissory note analogy, he paused. And in that breach, something unexpected, historic and largely unheralded happened. Martin's favorite gospel singer, Mahalia Jackson, who had performed earlier in the day, called to him from nearby: "Tell 'em about the dream, Martin, tell 'em about the dream!"

Martin clutched the speaker's lectern and seemed to reset. I watched him push the text of his prepared remarks to one side. I knew this performance had just been given over to the spirit of the moment. I leaned over and said to the person next to me, "These people out there today don't know it yet, but they're about ready to go to church."

What could possibly motivate a man standing before a crowd of hundreds of thousands, with television cameras beaming his every move and a cluster of microphones tracing his every word, to abandon the prepared text of his speech and begin riffing on a theme that he had used previously without generating much enthusiasm from listeners?

Before our eyes, he transformed himself into the superb, third-generation Baptist preacher that he was, and he spoke those words that in retrospect feel destined to ring out that day:

I have a dream . . .

In front of all those people, cameras, and microphones, Martin winged it. But then, no one I've ever met could improvise better.

The speech went on to depart drastically from the draft I'd delivered, and I'll be the first to tell you that America is the better for it. As I look back on my version, I realize that nearly any confident public speaker could have held the crowd's attention with it. But a different man could not have delivered "I Have a Dream."

Some believe, though the facts are otherwise, that Martin was such a superlative writer that he never needed others to draft material for him. I understand that belief; fate made Martin a martyr and a unique American myth - and myths stand alone. But admitting that even this unequaled writer had people helping him hardly takes anything away. People like Stanley, Mahalia and I helped him maximize his brilliance. If not, why would Mahalia interrupt a planned address? She wasn't unhappy with the material he was reading - she just wanted him to preach.

That he did. You only have to hear the recording of even a handful of the words from his speech and, for the rest of your life, when you read it you will hear his signature cadence. Can you hear it now?

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today!

The crowd was rapt. Tears of joy fell everywhere. And when Martin ended with a cried refrain from a spiritual that predated the Emancipation Proclamation, the sense of history - past and future - struck me full force:

Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!

***

More than 40 years later, I was invited to visit Stanford University's Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute as a candidate for an academic post. I met with the director, who knew I had just started work on a book about Martin and wanted to convince me that I should write it there. To demonstrate the wealth of the institute's research materials, he had me choose a date from the years I had worked with Martin.

I offered Aug. 28, 1963.

One of the staffers soon brought in a cardboard box with papers related to that day. Among them was a copy of the program that had been handed out at the march. At the time, no one could possibly understand the emotional impact this had on me. It was the standard program except for one corner, where it bore a handwritten note to Martin - from me.

"Dear Martin - just learned that Dr. W.E.B. Dubois died last night in Ghana. Someone should make note of this fact."

I was looking at a copy of my own program, something I'd urgently written on and passed through the crowd to Martin up on the dais. Tears welled in my eyes as I imagined its long journey from my hand to the institute's files. I felt Martin, my friend, reaching out and saying to me, "Keep our dream alive."

That is what this country does every January on Martin Luther King Day. I am hopeful that sometime soon, it will be what we do every day of the year.

Clarence B. Jones, a scholar in residence at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute at Stanford University, is a co-author, with Stuart Connelly, of the new book "Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech That Transformed a Nation," from which this essay is adapted.

Read more from Outlook.


© 2011 The Washington Post Company

Behind MLK's Dream Speech - AEI Client Stuart Connelly's Behind The Dream

Martin Luther King Jr. speaks during his 'I Have a Dream' speech, Aug. 28, 1963.

A close friend of King has written a book about his 'I Have a Dream' speech. | Photo by AP

When the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. stood before 250,000 people gathered at the Lincoln Memorial on Aug. 28, 1963, he had notes for his speech in front of him. Nowhere in these notes, or in any previous drafts of the speech, however, were the words “I have a dream.”

Clarence Jones knows this — he helped King write the drafts of the speech. He also stood behind King when acclaimed gospel singer Mahalia Jackson called out, “Tell them about the dream, Martin!” And he watched as King put aside his notes and stopped for a pregnant pause before uttering the most celebrated phrase of the modern civil rights movement.

"It was completely extemporaneous — of the moment," Jones, the former personal counsel, adviser, speech writer and close friend of King, told POLITICO. Recalling the moment King went off-script, he said "I read his body language, then I turned to the person next to me and said, 'These people don't know it, but they're about ready to go to church.'"

Jones, now a scholar-in-residence at the Martin Luther King Jr. Institute at Stanford University, is one of the last surviving confidants of King’s who was with him throughout the buildup and preparation for the March on Washington. He recounts the events leading up to the speech in detail in his forthcoming book, co-written with Stuart Connelly, “Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech That Transformed a Nation,” released by Palgrave Macmillan on Jan. 4.

Jones told POLITICO that the book offers rare insight into what went on behind the scenes before and during the historic march.

"I don't think the public knew, but up until 24 hours before the march, there was a little bit of skepticism among the organizers. There was anxiety about how many people might attend. We didn't have Blackberries or cell phones, or anything like that. The best we had was spotters near major highways saying, 'There seem to be a lot of people coming in,'" he said.

There was concern too, said Jones, about how many white people would attend the march, since too small a number would have undermined the message that an integrated, multi-racial society could work. That a quarter of participants were white came as a relief to organizers.

Some information about the organization of the march even came as a surprise to co-author Connelly. Concerns about turnout, for example, were also rooted in economic considerations:

"The organizers had taken on huge debt to finance the March, and the key to paying back their loans was the sale of souvenirs. Buttons and posters had to move, and if too few people showed, financial ruin would've followed," Connelly told POLITICO via e-mail.

He said that the financial aspect of the event perhaps should not have come as such a surprise to him - concerns over money being "endemic to every enterprise" like the March on Washington. Yet, logistics and organization are often overlooked when we recall the historic event.

"I'm from a generation that views the March on Washington as something nearly pre-ordained. Something that was 'supposed' to happen," said Connelly. "I think that's a dangerous way to view history because it lets people off the hook when it comes to trying to change the world themselves. Clarence is one of the last strategists of the civil rights movement to authoritatively tell future generations that the key to change is to take action. Even if it isn't planned perfectly, it's better than waiting."

And Jones sees much need for change in America today, and believes that if King were still around, he would too.

"Dr. King would be happy as a general rule at seeing minorities moving upwards towards the middle class. And he would be pleased that the United States elected an African-American president. But one would have to be a little dishonest about the reality of things I you don't admit: Things are happening that should not be occurring."

Jones told POLITICO that he believes the "wanton" gun violence in urban centers would be "a matter of appalling concern to [King]." Also on that list would be an issue that, in Jones's words "continues to fester" - that is, the relationship between the African-American community and the police in America.

"There seems to be a repetition of an ugly experience of police in urban communities putting discretion on hold and pulling the trigger," said Jones. (To name just one horrifying example: Last year, in Oakland, Calif., Oscar Grant, a young black man, was shot in the back and killed by police officer Johannes Mehserle. There is video footage of Grant, who was unarmed, prostrate on the floor when the shot was fired. Mehserle was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter.)

And so, Jones considers it crucial that young people look back to King and the words of his celebrated speech. "There is nothing more powerful than the words themselves, all I seek to do [with 'Behind the Dream'] is fill in the blank space," he said.

“I’m going to be 80 years old next month,” Jones says. “There may be people still around who were part of the civil rights movement, but virtually no one who was with Martin Luther King Jr. 24/7 in the weeks before and during the March on Washington. This book may be the last eyewitness account that history will be able to offer of this momentous event, and that’s why I wrote it.”


http://www.politico.com/

AEI Client Stuart Connelly's Behind The Dream 16th on Amazon Book List

Hot New Releases in Rhetoric



1.
Power in Words Release Date: October 12, 2010
In Stock

List Price: $24.95

Price: $16.47

You Save: $8.48 (34%)

33 used & new from $8.98


2.
Larte della
L'arte della guerra (Italian Edition)
Auto-delivered wirelessly

Kindle Price: $0.99


3.
It Was the Best of Sentences, It Was the Worst of Sentences 4.2 out of 5 stars (8)
Auto-delivered wirelessly

Kindle Price: $9.58


4.
Power in Words Auto-delivered wirelessly

Kindle Price: $9.99

5.
Enemyship Publication Date: November 30, 2010
Available for Pre-order

List Price: $59.95

Price: $37.77

You Save: $22.18 (37%)

6.
Inessential Solidarity Publication Date: October 28, 2010
In stock on October 26, 2010

Price: $24.95

7.
The Public Work of Rhetoric Release Date: October 31, 2010
Available for Pre-order

Price: $49.95

8.
Thinking in Circles 4.0 out of 5 stars (1)
Publication Date: September 28, 2010
In Stock

List Price: $24.00

Price: $17.28

You Save: $6.72 (28%)

25 used & new from $17.25

9.
Academic Writing Publication Date: March 15, 2011
Available for Pre-order

Price: $37.95

10.
How to Auto-delivered wirelessly

Kindle Price: $4.77

11.
Postclassical Narratology Publication Date: October 28, 2010
In Stock

List Price: $32.95

Price: $27.01

You Save: $5.94 (18%)

5 new from $27.01

12.
Cartas a
Cartas a los Jonquieres (Spanish Edition)
Publication Date: October 15, 2010
In Stock

List Price: $24.99

Price: $18.24

You Save: $6.75 (27%)

12 used & new from $16.48

13.
The Backwards Research Guide for Writers Publication Date: October 31, 2010
Available for Pre-order

Price: $24.95

14.
How to Write a Sentence Release Date: January 25, 2011
Available for Pre-order

List Price: $19.99

Price: $13.49

You Save: $6.50 (33%)

15.
The Rhetoric Publication Date: December 16, 2010
Available for Pre-order

List Price: $65.00

Price: $57.98

You Save: $7.02 (11%)

16.
Behind the Dream Release Date: January 4, 2011
Available for Pre-order

List Price: $22.00

Price: $14.85